The following are a list of resources for finding proposed legislation. The federal register is the only official source of proposed regulations, but the other sites can provide useful commentary.
Below are feeds from various immigration law blogs available at lexmonitor.com
80+ Google Reviews for the Law Firm of Kevin P. Sheerin
New NYPD Candidate Hiring Policies for 2025...
In response to the NYPD Hiring Crisis, one of the changes being introduced in the New Plan is a reduction in College Credit Requirements for Police Academy Entry.
To read the complete NYPD Article click the following link:
The Police Commissioner is introducing a three-part plan to attract more candidates and modernize NYPD education requirements. This three-part plan includes:
1) reducing the number of college credits required of candidates in order to enter the Police Academy,
2) increasing the credits earned by completing recruit training at the academy, and
3) reinstating the timed-run requirement to graduate.
The NYPD is one of the only municipal police forces in the country that still requires college credits for candidates. As a result, in 2023, 29% of NYPD applications (which affected 2,275 potential officers) were disqualified solely because of this requirement. To remedy this hiring crisis, these changes will allow the NYPD to attract more potential officers while maintaining academic and fitness standards.
“Effective immediately, the NYPD will reduce the college credit requirement to enter the Police Academy from 60 credits to 24 credits. Individuals interested in an NYPD career who have acquired a minimum of 24 college credits are now eligible to apply, including more than 5,000 candidates on 29 active civil service lists who were previously ineligible.”
NYPD Commissioner Tisch is acutely aware of the current crisis facing the department, stating that NYPD Police Officers “work tirelessly to keep crime down and protect our communities, but it’s no secret that the NYPD is facing a hiring crisis. These changes will bring the department more in line with peer agencies across the country, strengthen our officer training, and ensure that the NYPD remains the best, and most rewarding way for someone to serve their community.”
If you failed your NYPD Psychological Evaluation or have been disqualified for any reason and would like to schedule a free consultation, feel free to contact Kevin Sheerin at 516.248.0040.
Email: kevin@sheerinlaw.com
Website: www.sheerinlaw.com
Blog: civilservice.sheerinlaw.com
Podcast: www.newyorkcivilservicelawattorneypodcast.com
-New NYPD Candidate Hiring Policies for 2025
On May 18, 2025, the House Budget Committee approved the legislation entitled, “The One, Big, Beautiful Bill” (the “House Bill”). The bill is expected to be revised by the House Rules Committee before being sent to the House floor for a vote.
The House Bill extends a number of provisions from the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (“TCJA”) and enacts a number of new provisions. The following is a summary of some of the key provisions from the currently available version of the House Bill:
Business Provisions:
Tax-Exempt Provisions
Individual Provisions
[1] Assume a married couple filing jointly has taxable income of $851,600 ($100,000 more than the 37% bracket threshold and a charitable deduction of $100,000 (and no other itemized deductions). The House Bill reduces the couple’s deduction by $5,405.41 (2/37*$100,000) and increases the couple’s tax bill by $2,000 ($5,405.41*37%, which is equal to an additional 2% tax (i.e., total of 39%) on the couple’s incremental $100,000 over the 37% bracket threshold.
Friday brought the news that Moody’s, one of the three agencies that evaluate U.S. government debt, downgraded that debt to Aa1. This has triggered lots of commentary and investment houses are actually reaching out to investors to “discuss” what this means.
This is not my area but it in a broader sense it is the concern of every American who invests or hopes someday to benefit from our social security and Medicare programs. So, I tried to survey what I could in terms of seminars and professional writing. And, here is my layman’s take. The subject needs to be approached with a lot of care. This, once largely economic topic has taken on a huge political aspect. Second, the investment community has a vested interest in not just keeping our portfolios but in continuing to woo us to invest. It’s how their bread is buttered. We tend to forget that if we are 401K participants, we are investing everytime we are paid.
A lot of what I listened to was pretty esoteric. The six fund managers from Dreyfus and BNY Mellon I heard this morning were focused on how foreign markets will respond to the ratings cut. The first news is that Moody’s was actually the last of the big three credit agencies to cut the U.S. rating. Fitch and Standard & Poors did this years ago. It seems that Moody’s may be reacting more to the political turbulence of the last 4 months because there seems no clear path toward either continuing the 2017 tax relief (due to expire next year) or toward cutting a deficit that hasn’t much slowed since 2020 when Covid came to visit. We weren’t on a good course before Covid but the government was borrowing at low rates. Now the debt incurred during and after Covid has nearly doubled (from $20 to 36 trillion) and we are paying neary 4.5% to pay that debt.
So, what is the poor man’s takeaway from all of this. All the commentators seem agreed this is not the time to abandon stocks and bonds to buy gold (although if you bought it a year ago your $2,300 ounce is closing in on $3,300). But the concensus is that investors are tacking away from the United States as the cornerstone of world currency and investment markets. The good news is that for now, there really aren’t other reasonable choices. China is still struggling with its own economic crisis and lots of people think their data is not honest. The European Union is, as Great Britain showed, a consortium of countries some of which are very strong (e.g. Germany) while others struggle with slow growth and enormous debt. In a word, we still attract investors both for U.S. debt and other investments because we have been the mainstay for 75 years. Moreoever, our markets have relatively solid regulation through the S.E.C. and we have lots of independent eyes watching what we do.
The challenge of the day is our own fiscal policy. Our debt has exploded. The current administration has said each of the following: (a) we will cut taxes (b) we will substitute tariffs for personal income taxes (c) we will balance the budget (d) we won’t make serious cuts to our most expensive programs (e.g., social security, medicare, medicaid, defense). The rest of the world is looking on, scratching their foreign heads and asking: “How you gonna do all those things?” Many of the people running foreign economies in the Middle and Far East are economists trained in prestigious American universities. They saw the DOGE was preceded by far better organized groups devoted to balancing the budget. Alas, the Grace Commission (under Reagan) and the Simpson-Bowles initiatives (under Obama) all foundered on the rocks of our belief that the American economy could be stimulated to outgrow the deficit. We are stilling hearing elements of that optimism from conservative groups while their liberal counterparts seem to ignore the elephant in the room.
The good news remains that aside from a debt ceiling which is causing the Treasury Department to scramble and the fact that we are still operating under an extension of the much maligned Biden budget, we aren’t in any instant danger. But cracks are appearing in the hull of the ship. Witness the fact that in Delaware County, Pennsylvania (the state’s fourth wealthiest) a 400 bed primary care hospital and trauma center abruptly closed this month when no one would acquire it. In 2022, nearby Chester County saw the abrupt closure of two primary care hospitals with a combined 200 beds. Chester is Pennsylvania’s wealthiest county. The transportation system of the Philadelphia region’s $500 billion economy is without a budget. These things are the infrastructure that supports 6,200,000 people living in Metro Philadelphia. And the people who lend us the money to make all of these things work are demanding higher interest rate and looking at other places to invest. Smoke, mirrors and our everlasting promises for government efficiency are not going to cut it much longer.
Oh yes, some may rightly ask, how this relates to a Domestic Relations blog. As we have tried to point out, divorce is a financial transaction. People who have experienced it or are now confronting it must pay some attention to their financial resources in the future. Friday’s after market news from Moody’s did not have any effect on either the markets or the dollar today (5/19). But there are caution lights ahead as Congress tackles a tax bill and a budget. You can go on line and see an estimate of what will be your projected social security benefits and Medicare costs. Lots of our representatives in Washington say this is a sacred obligation. We shall see.
The title of this post is the title of this new paper authored by Laura Appleman now available via SSRN. Here is its abstract:
The intersection of eugenics and Progressive Era reform in the late 19th and early 20th centuries played a crucial but often overlooked role in shaping America’s modern criminal justice system. This Article examines how racism, eugenics, and psychiatric theory combined to create systems of classification and control that still influence our infrastructure of criminal law and punishment today. While Progressive Era reformers sought to modernize the criminal system, their efforts were deeply influenced by eugenic theories, which fundamentally transformed criminal courts, sentencing practices, and criminology. Although scholars have extensively analyzed contemporary mass incarceration, the Progressive Era’s complex legacy — particularly how its reforms, rooted in eugenic thinking, have contributed to our current systemic problems — remains understudied. By illuminating this forgotten history, this Article aims to provide insights that could help reform our troubled carceral state.
The Sedona Conference® (TSC) has published for public comment its Commentary on Discovery of Mobile Device Data.
The post Commentary on Discovery of Mobile Device Data from The Sedona Conference: eDiscovery Trends appeared first on eDiscovery Today by Doug Austin.
Below are few independent immigration law websites.
Follow immigration law news on Twitter.
![]() This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. |