Skip to main content

Clean Air Act: Articles

This guide supports Dr. Preston McLane's class on the Clean Air Act.

Off-campus Access

If you are off-campus, link to HeinOnline and SSRN after signing in here on the Research Center home page.


Journals begin with Volume 1, which predates Westlaw and Lexis and covers the crucial 1960-1970 era of air pollution regulation.

Westlaw and Lexis

Journal coverage for Westlaw and Lexis begins in the early 1980s.

Search: JLR for law reviews and journal articles.

Search, then restrict by "law reviews and journals".



ProQuest logo

Pollution AbstractsA leading resource for references to environmentally related literature on pollution, its sources, and its control. This database combines information on scientific research and government policies in a single resource and provides fast access to the environmental information necessary to resolve day-to-day problems, ensure ongoing compliance and handle emergency situations more effectively.

Environmental Science and Pollution ManagementThis multidisciplinary database provides comprehensive coverage of the environmental sciences.

Environmental Impact Statements: DigestsExtracts the key issues from complex government-released environmental impact statements, converting massive documents into concise, readable abstracts.

National Service Center for Environmental Publications (NSCEP)Full text of over 7,000 reports and other documents covering many environmental topics including solid waste disposal, water quality, and pesticide usage and disposal.


SSRN contains articles submitted for review before publication in law reviews and journals; working paper series; and unpublished papers.  Look here for articles that are not yet available in Westlaw, Lexis or HeinOnline.


Clean Air Act

FSU College of Law – Fall 2014
Selected Articles

 ·         Harold W. Kennedy and Andrew O. Porter, “Air Pollution: Its Control and Abatement,” Vand. L. Rev. 8 (1955).

·         Joel Franklin Brenner, “Nuisance Law and the Industrial Revolution,” J. Legal Stud. 3 (1974).

·         Samuel A. Bleicher, “Economic and Technical Feasibility in Clean Air Act Enforcement against Stationary Sources,” 89 Harv. L. Rev. 316 (December 1975) 

·         D. Bruce La Pierre, “Technology-Forcing and Federal Environmental Protection Statutes,” 62 Iowa L. Rev. (1976-77).

·         Richard B. Stewart, “The Development of Administrative and Quasi-Constitutional Law in Judicial Review of Environmental Decision-making: Lessons from the Clean Air Act,” 62 Iowa L. Rev. 713 (1976-77).

·         William H. Proskop, “Developing Odor Control Regulations: Guidelines and Considerations,” J. of the Air Pollution Control Association 28 (1978).

·         Bruce A. Ackerman and William T. Hassler, “Beyond the New Deal: Coal and the Clean Air Act,” 89 Yale L.J. 1466 (July 1980).

·         William F. Pedersen Jr., “Why the Clean Air Act Works Badly,” 129 U. Pa. L. Rev. 1059 (1980-1981)

·         David Schoenbrod, “Goals Statutes or Rules Statutes: The Case of the Clean Air Act,” UCLA L. Rev. 30 (1983).

·         John D. Graham, “The Failure of Agency-Forcing: The Regulation of Airborne Carcinogens under Section 112 of the Clean Air Act,” Duke L. J. 1985 (1985).

·         Robert Bone, “Normative Theory and Legal Doctrine in American Nuisance Law: 1850 to 1920,” S. Cal. L. Rev. 59 (1986).

·         Jeff L. Lewin, “Boomer and the American Law of Nuisance: Past, Present, and Future,” Alb. L. Rev. 54 (1990).

·         Timothy L. Williamson, “Fitting Title V into the Clean Air Act: Implementing the New Operating Permit Program,” 21 Envtl. L. 2085 (1991).

·         Howard Latin, “Regulatory Failure, Administrative Incentives, and the New Clean Air Act,” 21 Envtl. L. 1647 (1991).

·         Arnold W. Reitze, Jr., “Overview and Critique: A Century of Air Pollution Control Law: What’s Worked; What’s Failed; What Might Work,” Envtl. L. 21 (1991).

·         Richard Lazarus, “Pursuing ‘Environmental Justice’: The Distributional Effects of Environmental Protection,” Nw. U. L. Rev. 87 (1992).

·         Joseph M. Feller, “Non-Threshold Pollutants and Air Quality Standards,” Envtl. L. 24 (1994).

·         Richard H. Pildes and Cass R. Sunstein, “Reinventing the Regulatory State,” U. Chi. L. Rev. 62 (1995).

·         Wendy E. Wagner, “The Science Charade in Toxic Risk Regulation,” Colum. L. Rev. 95 (1995).

·         John P. Dwyer, “The Practice of Federalism under the Clean Air Act,” 54 Md. L. Rev. 1183 (1995).

·         Arnold W Reitze Jr., “Federalism and the Inspection and Maintenance Program under the Clean Air Act,” 27 Pac. L. J. 1461 (1995-1996).

·         Edmund Newell, “Atmospheric Pollution and the British Copper Industry,” Technology & Culture 38 (1997).

·         Rena I. Steinzor, “Reinventing Environmental Regulation: The Dangerous Journey from Command to Self-Control,” Harv. Envtl. L. Rev. 22 (1998).

·         Cass R. Sunstein, “Is the Clean Air Act Unconstitutional,” Mich. L. Rev. 98 (1999).

·         Wendy E. Wagner, “Innovations in Environmental Policy: The Triumph of Technology-Based Standards,” Univ. of Ill. L. Rev. 2000 (2000).

·         Lisa Heinzerling, “The Clean Air Act and the Constitution,” 20 St. Louis U. Pub. L. Rev. 121 (2001).

·         Jonathan Remy Nash and Richard L. Revesz, “Markets and Geography: Designing Marketable Permit Schemes to Control Local and Regional Pollutants,” Ecology L. Q. 28 (2001).

·         Arnold W. Reitze and Randy Lowell, “Control of Hazardous Air Pollution,” B. C. Envtl. Aff. L. Rev. 28 (2001).

·         Bernard D. Goldstein and Russellyn S.Carruth, “Implications of the Precautionary Principle for Environmental Regulation in the United States: Examples from the Control of Hazardous Air Pollutants in the 1990 Clean Air Act Amendments,” 66 Law & Contemp. Probs. 247 (2003).

·         Joseph Goffman, “Title IV of the Clean Air Act: Lessons for Success of the Acid Rain Emissions Trading Program,” 14 Penn St. Envtl. L. Rev. 177 (2005-2006).

·         Christopher T.Giovinazzo, “Defending Overstatement: The Symbolic Clean Air Act and Carbon Dioxide,” 30 Harv. Envtl. L. Rev. 99 (2006).

·         Jason Scott Johnston, “Climate Change Confusion and the Supreme Court: The Misguided Regulation of Greenhouse Gas Emissions under the Clean Air Act,” 84 Notre Dame L. Rev. 1 (2008-2009).

·         Nathan Richardson, “Greenhouse Gas Regulation under the Clean Air Act: Does Chevron Set the EPA Free,” 29 Stan. Envtl. L. J. 283 (2010).

·         Arnold W. Reitze Jr., “Intersection of Climate Change and Clean Air Act Stationary Source Programs,” 43 Ariz. St. L.J. 901 (2011).

·         Nigel Barella, “Comment, North Carolina v. Tennessee Valley Authority,” 35 Harv. Envtl. L. Rev. 247 (2011).

·         David R. Brody, “Comment, American Electric Power Co. v. Connecticut,” 36 Harv. Envtl. L. Rev. 297 (2012).

·         Laura King, “Changing Climate, Unchanging Act, Improvising Agency, Enabling Court: The Story of Coalition for Responsible Regulation v. EPA,” 37 Harv. Envtl. L. Rev. 267 (2013).

·         Jeremy Feigenbaum, “Becoming Good Neighbors After EME Homer Generation, L.P. v. EPA,” 38 Harv Envtl. L. Rev. 259 (2014).

Google Scholar

If you have signed in to Off-campus Access, You can frequently link directly to articles from Google Scholar.  Use Google Scholar to find relevant articles in non-law or law-related journals.  

Click on the small drop-down tab next to "my citations," then on Settings, and then on Library Links.  Now, "Find it @ FSU" will appear in the right column.

Guides   |   Ask-A-Librarian   |   Book-A-Librarian   |   Suggest an Item   |   A-Z List   
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.