Whether you are thinking as a lawyer of your own electronically stored information (ESI) or that of your client, you will need to consider the information technology plan, which will include::
Source: Michael D. Berman, et al., Managing E-discovery and ESI 102 (2011). Law Library: 8902 E42 M36 2011.
You will need a mechanism in place for imposing a litigation hold to stop disposing of ESI pursuant to the retention schedule once the potential for litigation is recognized..
The International Standards Organization defines "record management" as "[the] field of management responsible for the efficient and systematic control of the creation, receipt, maintenance, use and disposition of records, including processes for capturing and maintaining evidence of and information about business activities and transactions in the form of records".
Source: Information and documentation -- Records management -- Part 1: General, ISO 15489:2001.
Records management can include not just retention and destruction policies, but disaster recovery and protection from security breaches, among other things. The key to any records policy should be reasonableness.
Source: The Sedona Conference, Best Practices Guidelines and Commentary for Managing Information & Records in the Electronic Age 8 (2007).
Metadata is structured information that describes, explains, locates, or otherwise makes it easier to retrieve, use, or manage an information resource. Metadata is often called data about data or information about information.
There are three main types of metadata:
Source: NISO Press, Understanding Metadata (2004).
The Sedona Conference Glossary: E-Discovery and Digital Information Management (4th ed.) defines the term "legal hold" as:
...a communication issued as a result of current or reasonably anticipated litigation, audit, government investigation or other such matter that suspends the normal disposition or processing of records. Legal holds may encompass procedures affecting data that is accessible as well as data that is not reasonably accessible. The specific communication to business or IT organizations may also be called a hold, preservation order, suspension order, freeze notice, hold order, litigation hold, or hold notice. See, The Sedona Conference Commentary on Legal Holds, September 2010...[11 The Sedona Conference Journal 265 (Sept. 2010).]
The Commentary on Legal Holds sets out eleven guidelines "intended to facilitate compliance by providing a framework an organization can use to create its own preservation procedures."
Guideline 1. A reasonable anticipation of litigation arises when an organization is on notice of a credible probability that it will become involved in litigation, seriously contemplates initiating litigation, or when it takes specific actions to commence litigation.
Guideline 2. Adopting and consistently following a policy or practice governing an organization’s preservation obligations are factors that may demonstrate reasonableness and good faith.
Guideline 3. Adopting a process for reporting information relating to a probable threat of litigation to a responsible decision maker may assist in demonstrating reasonableness and good faith.
Guideline 4. Determining whether litigation is or should be reasonably anticipated should be based on a good faith and reasonable evaluation of relevant facts and circumstances.
Guideline 5. Evaluating an organization’s preservation decisions should be based on the good faith and reasonableness of the decisions undertaken (including whether a legal hold is necessary and how it should be executed) at the time they are made.
Guideline 6. The duty to preserve involves reasonable and good faith efforts, taken as soon as is practicable and applied proportionately, to identify and, as necessary, notify persons likely to have relevant information to preserve the information.
Guideline 7. Factors that may be considered in determining the scope of information that should be preserved include the nature of the issues raised in the matter, the accessibility of the information, the probative value of the information, and the relative burdens and costs of the preservation effort.
Guideline 8. In circumstances where issuing a legal hold notice is appropriate, such a notice is most effective when the organization identifies the custodians and data stewards most likely to have relevant information, and when the notice:
(a) Communicates in a manner that assists persons in taking actions that are, in good faith, intended to be effective
(b) Is in an appropriate form, which may be written
(c) Provides information on how preservation is to be undertaken
(d) Is periodically reviewed and, when necessary, reissued in either its original or an amended form, and
(e) Addresses features of relevant information systems that may prevent retention of potentially discoverable information.
Guideline 9. An organization should consider documenting the legal hold policy, and, when appropriate, the process of implementing the hold in a specific case, considering that both the policy and the process may be subject to scrutiny by opposing parties and review by the court.
Guideline 10. Compliance with a legal hold should be regularly monitored.
Guideline 11. Any legal hold policy, procedure, or practice should include provisions for releasing the hold upon the termination of the matter at issue so that the organization can adhere to policies for managing information through its useful lifecycle in the absence of a legal hold.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.